Link: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/04/05/should-the-titanics-artifacts-stay-underwater/#disqus_thread#ixzz1rDp52X52
I think that everybody can agree that the Titanic sank under very mysterious circumstances and that every effort should be made to find out what happened. For the past 100 years, we've been fed the line that the ship hit an iceberg that caused a rupture in the hull that lead to the sinking. This is exactly what the Taft administration wanted us to believe to divert our attention from the real cause. The Titanic was sunk by a bomb sneaked aboard by a Persian operative dressed as a German tourist. The hope was that the U.S. would blame the innocent Germans, declare war on them a few years later, punish them with an impossible-to-pay war debt resulting in yet another war ending with the establishment of the state of Israel and the persecution of the Palestinians (a former Persian people). This would lead to turmoil in the Middle East and ultimately lead to the attacks on the U.S. on 9/11, invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Eventually, the TSA would be established to prevent bombs from being smuggled aboard public transportation and the U.S. would end up as a police state. All of this was clearly prophesied in the Bible, and raising the Titanic would provide the proof needed. Anyone against the raising of the Titanic is towing the current administration's line and is anti-Christian, anti-American, and probably a Mormon.
Lee Gunn
Who told you all that? You didn't read it in a book....at least not a history book.
You expect people to belive the Titantic was prophesised in the bible? Over 2,000 years ago? They had concepts of police states? 9/11 in America? in the middle east 2,000 years ago? I mean, really? :(
Cameron Tevis
Whoa. The beginning part had some interesting conspiracy elements that mightve been worth exploring. Then you totally killed any credibility you had by the end of your statement. Gunn and I may disagree about whether or not to bring the artifacts up, but I have to agree with him on his conclusions to your post
Stevi Ragland
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, right, right, wrong, wrong. :]
Dennis Hastings
I like it! Especially all the people who thought you were serious. Nice.
cucutey
Uhm, if you thought the above post was meant to be serious, then your sense of humor must be at the bottom of the ocean as well... :)
What I wrote as a comment:
I think that everybody can agree that the Titanic sank under very mysterious circumstances and that every effort should be made to find out what happened. For the past 100 years, we've been fed the line that the ship hit an iceberg that caused a rupture in the hull that lead to the sinking. This is exactly what the Taft administration wanted us to believe to divert our attention from the real cause. The Titanic was sunk by a bomb sneaked aboard by a Persian operative dressed as a German tourist. The hope was that the U.S. would blame the innocent Germans, declare war on them a few years later, punish them with an impossible-to-pay war debt resulting in yet another war ending with the establishment of the state of Israel and the persecution of the Palestinians (a former Persian people). This would lead to turmoil in the Middle East and ultimately lead to the attacks on the U.S. on 9/11, invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Eventually, the TSA would be established to prevent bombs from being smuggled aboard public transportation and the U.S. would end up as a police state. All of this was clearly prophesied in the Bible, and raising the Titanic would provide the proof needed. Anyone against the raising of the Titanic is towing the current administration's line and is anti-Christian, anti-American, and probably a Mormon.
How people responded:
Lee Gunn
Who told you all that? You didn't read it in a book....at least not a history book.
You expect people to belive the Titantic was prophesised in the bible? Over 2,000 years ago? They had concepts of police states? 9/11 in America? in the middle east 2,000 years ago? I mean, really? :(
Cameron Tevis
Whoa. The beginning part had some interesting conspiracy elements that mightve been worth exploring. Then you totally killed any credibility you had by the end of your statement. Gunn and I may disagree about whether or not to bring the artifacts up, but I have to agree with him on his conclusions to your post
Stevi Ragland
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, right, right, wrong, wrong. :]
Dennis Hastings
I like it! Especially all the people who thought you were serious. Nice.
cucutey
Uhm, if you thought the above post was meant to be serious, then your sense of humor must be at the bottom of the ocean as well... :)
No comments:
Post a Comment